Vtols and counters

Post here your ideas for the game engine (not campaign)

Moderators: BeeRockxs, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
NapoleonSolo
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Location: Ireland

Vtols and counters

Post by NapoleonSolo » Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:51 pm

Before any1 shoots off this isnt a whine but a possible solution for dealing with vtols that can be approved or dismissed im just putting it out there.

We all know AA is disabled and personally i believe aa should stay disabled, and im not even a major vtol user, but in general vtols are lightly armored, dont get benefit of terrain\smoke\forest modifiers and can only rely on their speed which the aa greatly outnumbers so here is my proposal.....

We already have flak ammo (ac2, ac5) for shooting vtols (albeit a bit buggy atm) but i would put forward that maybe another type of weapon to counter vtols.

Lrm's have the ability to fire fragmentation ammo.....yes yes i know its good against soft targets only but if it wasnt too much effort to code how would ppl feel about the lrm 5 only having the ability to shoot vtols at a -1 ( 9's to hit instead of 10's ) wit frag lrm ammo using the lrm 5 table for damage done wit a -2 to the missiles hitting target roll ( 11 on lrm5 table now a 9 ).

Ive thought about this carefull, we could POSSIBLY allow 2 vtols per lance with this also and now more variety to hit vtols without the aa having to be turned back on ?

All opinions, altered ideas and death threats welcomed :P

Spork
Mekwars Developer
Posts: 3856
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:23 pm

Post by Spork » Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:54 pm

This is a game-engine suggestion, not a campaign suggestion. Moved.
Never had much, grew up with nothing
But the music, well it was something
Been down and out, I've been on top of the world,
World that keeps on spinning on a turntable.

User avatar
NapoleonSolo
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by NapoleonSolo » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:45 am

52 view and no comments cmon.....

Ching Tsian
Posts: 374
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:22 pm

Post by Ching Tsian » Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:10 am

This is not according to any rule book i ever read and i don't think it is neccessary.

Sarin
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:13 am

Post by Sarin » Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:14 pm

the no comments is simple, i find the idea rather stupid ;)
+ it needs a hell lot of code and does violate BT rules.
im all for AA.

User avatar
Calkayne
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Re: Vtols and counters

Post by Calkayne » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:42 pm

NapoleonSolo wrote:but in general vtols are lightly armored, dont get benefit of terrain\smoke\forest modifiers
VTOLs can use the Terrain for Defensive Advantage, they just need to change elevation to suit. (They can descend into Heavy smoke behind Heavy Woods for example)

imho (and a lover of VTOLs) I like the idea of Flak when the little bugs are ironed out. With AA gone there is a requirement for a valid defence Vs VTOLs. (Though most people I see are their own enemy when using VTOLs)

Though I agree with other posters in that any rule addition for MegaMek should be base from an Official Text..somewhere...out there.
The general who advances without coveting fame and retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only thought is to protect his country and do good service for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom.
- Sun Tzu

The Ati-N Brigade

User avatar
NapoleonSolo
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:07 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by NapoleonSolo » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:12 pm

guess thats a no then :P

oh well thought it would be fun idea

Post Reply